Weightlifting calculator...how accurate is this?

Any strength & power related training topic (powerlifting, strongman, olympic lifts, etc)
Post Reply
User avatar
galapogos
GM, Team Biceps
Posts: 9621
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 2:35 am
Enter the middle number in the list(3): 0
No curling in the: curl rack
Location: In front of my computer
Contact:

Weightlifting calculator...how accurate is this?

Post by galapogos »

http://www.sportexpert.biz/wl/ex.htm

It's pinpoint accurate on my classic lifts(80kg snatch, 100kg c+j for 180kg total), and power snatch/clean are maybe about there...(haven't tried before), but it underestimates my front/back squat, and grossly underestimates my bench...

Power jerk = push jerk? What's a power pull? Clean pull?

User avatar
h
Pro and hardcore
Posts: 1579
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 3:56 pm

Re: Weightlifting calculator...how accurate is this?

Post by h »

one size fits all never really fits anything.

in my case, my squat numbers are joke, so either they get way overestimated, or they cause everything else to look like shit.
prudens quaestio dimidium scientiae...
Image

User avatar
galapogos
GM, Team Biceps
Posts: 9621
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 2:35 am
Enter the middle number in the list(3): 0
No curling in the: curl rack
Location: In front of my computer
Contact:

Re: Weightlifting calculator...how accurate is this?

Post by galapogos »

h wrote:one size fits all never really fits anything.

in my case, my squat numbers are joke, so either they get way overestimated, or they cause everything else to look like shit.
well i'm guessing it would be more accurate to people who have gotten both technique and strength down. And also more relevant/accurate to the classic lifts rather than the accessory ones...I'm taking it that because I can squat that much, I *should* be able to clean/snatch this much. The fact that I am nowhere near, probably points more to a technique/speed issue than a strength one. I've read one of Dan John's coaches say that you should be able to clean what you can front squat for 3. That kinda makes sense to me. I'm still very far from that though.

User avatar
M.Hunter
Pro and hardcore
Posts: 1052
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 9:57 pm
Enter the middle number in the list(3): 0
No curling in the: curl rack

Re: Weightlifting calculator...how accurate is this?

Post by M.Hunter »

galapogos wrote: I've read one of Dan John's coaches say that you should be able to clean what you can front squat for 3.
Wa like that i'm damn far away.. So i really have been reverse curling..
Squats can only strengthen, tear or break something. Strengthening, tearing and breaking is totally awesome. Thus squats are awesome.

User avatar
galapogos
GM, Team Biceps
Posts: 9621
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 2:35 am
Enter the middle number in the list(3): 0
No curling in the: curl rack
Location: In front of my computer
Contact:

Re: Weightlifting calculator...how accurate is this?

Post by galapogos »

Before I trained at SWF I was also reverse curling hehe...can be improved one

User avatar
h
Pro and hardcore
Posts: 1579
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 3:56 pm

Re: Weightlifting calculator...how accurate is this?

Post by h »

i looked at the scale again... and noticed that:
CJ% > PC% (or PJ%)

so this scale won't apply to noobs like me at all.
prudens quaestio dimidium scientiae...
Image

User avatar
galapogos
GM, Team Biceps
Posts: 9621
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 2:35 am
Enter the middle number in the list(3): 0
No curling in the: curl rack
Location: In front of my computer
Contact:

Re: Weightlifting calculator...how accurate is this?

Post by galapogos »

Yeah, obviously C+J > PC or PJ. You don't have to clean as high in the C+J, so less strength/power is needed. And PJ is usually more taxing and inefficient than the SJ, so many olympic lifters use the SJ instead of the PJ, with a few notable exceptions like Pyrros and Zhang Guozheng.

User avatar
Mr Enigma
Barbells are my friends
Posts: 489
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 12:26 am
Enter the middle number in the list(3): 0
No curling in the: curl rack
Location: east
Contact:

Re: Weightlifting calculator...how accurate is this?

Post by Mr Enigma »

btw, SJ can mean split jerk or squat jerk. Dimas is power jerker. Zhang is squat jerker. both styles look similar, difference is how high they catch the bar.

each style has its pros and cons.. not everyone can PJ or squat jerk cuz you need good shoulder mobility.
Ziklag Fitness http://www.ziklagfitness.com/
Weightlifting blog http://weightliftingsingapore.wordpress.com/
SGWeightlifting http://www.youtube.com/user/SGWeightlifting

The definition of strength: “having the dedication, determination, desire, and discipline to believe and become.”

User avatar
galapogos
GM, Team Biceps
Posts: 9621
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 2:35 am
Enter the middle number in the list(3): 0
No curling in the: curl rack
Location: In front of my computer
Contact:

Re: Weightlifting calculator...how accurate is this?

Post by galapogos »

Mr Enigma wrote:btw, SJ can mean split jerk or squat jerk. Dimas is power jerker. Zhang is squat jerker. both styles look similar, difference is how high they catch the bar.

each style has its pros and cons.. not everyone can PJ or squat jerk cuz you need good shoulder mobility.
Wah I didn't know that. I thought either power/push/squat jerk all the same sia...just that the weight vv heavy so they bopian go all the way down. I see some of them, then catch in a power position, but then slowly sink down into a full overhead squat. Always thought it was just the weight being too heavy.

User avatar
Mr Enigma
Barbells are my friends
Posts: 489
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 12:26 am
Enter the middle number in the list(3): 0
No curling in the: curl rack
Location: east
Contact:

Re: Weightlifting calculator...how accurate is this?

Post by Mr Enigma »

galapogos wrote:
Mr Enigma wrote:btw, SJ can mean split jerk or squat jerk. Dimas is power jerker. Zhang is squat jerker. both styles look similar, difference is how high they catch the bar.

each style has its pros and cons.. not everyone can PJ or squat jerk cuz you need good shoulder mobility.
Wah I didn't know that. I thought either power/push/squat jerk all the same sia...just that the weight vv heavy so they bopian go all the way down. I see some of them, then catch in a power position, but then slowly sink down into a full overhead squat. Always thought it was just the weight being too heavy.
some are really bobian but some purposely go all the way. one weightlifter who can catch at power jerk height but goes down all the way is Zhan Xugang.

what i have seen from videos is that power jerkers dip shorter and drive the bar higher.
Ziklag Fitness http://www.ziklagfitness.com/
Weightlifting blog http://weightliftingsingapore.wordpress.com/
SGWeightlifting http://www.youtube.com/user/SGWeightlifting

The definition of strength: “having the dedication, determination, desire, and discipline to believe and become.”

Post Reply