Ankle ROM and muscle activation during a squat

Training related research
Post Reply
User avatar
galapogos
GM, Team Biceps
Posts: 10432
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 2:35 am
Location: In front of my computer
Contact:

Ankle ROM and muscle activation during a squat

Post by galapogos »

Limiting Ankle Dorsiflexion Range of Motion Alters Lower Extremity Kinematics and Muscle Activation Patterns during a Squat

CONTEXT:
Limitations in gastrocnemius/soleus flexibility, which restricts ankle dorsiflexion during dynamic tasks, have been reported in individuals with patellofemoral pain (PFP) and are theorized to play a role in the development of PFP.

OBJECTIVE:
To determine the effect of restricted ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (ROM) on lower extremity kinematics and muscle activity (EMG) during a squat. We hypothesized that restricted dorsiflexion ROM would alter knee kinematics and lower extremity EMG during a squat.

DESIGN:
Cross-Sectional.

PARTICIPANTS:
30 healthy, recreationally active individuals without a history of lower extremity injury.

INTERVENTIONS:
Each participant performed 7 trials of a double-leg squat under two conditions: a no-wedge condition (NW) with the foot flat on the floor and a wedge condition (W) with a 12 forefoot angle, to simulate reduced plantarflexor flexibility.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:
Three-dimensional hip and knee kinematics, medial knee displacement (MKD) and ankle dorsiflexion angle. EMG of vastus medialis oblique (VMO), vastus lateralis (VL), lateral gastrocnemius (LG), and soleus (SOL). One-way repeated measures ANOVAs were performed to determine differences between the W and NW conditions.

RESULTS:
Compared to the NW condition, the wedge produced decreased peak knee flexion (P < 0.001, Effect Size (ES) = 0.81) and knee flexion excursion (P < 0.001, ES = 0.82); while producing increased peak ankle dorsiflexion (P = 0.006, ES = 0.31), ankle dorsiflexion excursion (P < 0.001, ES = 0.31), peak knee valgus angle (P = 0.02, ES = 0.21), and MKD (P < 0.001, ES = 2.92). During the W condition, VL (P = 0.002, ES = 0.33) and VMO (P = 0.049, ES = 0.20) activity decreased while soleus activity increased (P = 0.03, ES = 0.64) compared to the NW condition. No changes were seen in hip kinematics (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS:
Altering ankle dorsiflexion starting position during a double-leg squat resulted in increased knee valgus and MKD as well as decreased quadriceps activation and increased soleus activation. These changes are similar to those seen in people with PFP.
Post Reply